Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 13 Jul 2009 (this version), latest version 11 Nov 2009 (v3)]
Title:Delineating cosmic expansion histories with supernova data
View PDFAbstract: Marginal likelihoods for the cosmic expansion rates are evaluated using the new `Constitution' data of 397 supernovae, thereby updating the results in some previous works. Even when beginning with a very strong prior probability in favour of an accelerated expansion, we end up with a marginal likelihood for the deceleration parameter q_0 peaked around zero in the spatially flat case. This casts doubt on the paradigm of acceleration itself. It is found that the new data significantly constrains the cosmic expansion rates with respect to time, when compared to the previous analyses. Here also we adopt the model-independent approach in which the scale factor is expanded into a Taylor series in time about the present epoch, but for practical purposes, it is truncated to polynomials of various orders. Though one cannot regard the polynomials thus obtained as models, in this paper we evaluate the total likelihood (Bayesian evidence) for them to find the order of the polynomial having the largest likelihood. Analysis using the Constitution data shows that the largest likelihood occurs for the fourth order polynomial and is of value \approx 0.77 \times 10^{-102}. We argue that only those realistic models, which have their likelihood greater than this model-independent value may be considered as successful. It is found that among the realistic cosmological models, none of the popular models we analysed have likelihood at least as much as that for the model-independent case and hence they do not pass our test.
Submission history
From: Moncy John Vilavinal [view email][v1] Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:42:44 UTC (18 KB)
[v2] Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:21:28 UTC (60 KB)
[v3] Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:20:22 UTC (61 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.