Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

arXiv:2401.12443 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Jan 2024 (v1), last revised 30 Jan 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Patch2QL: Discover Cognate Defects in Open Source Software Supply Chain With Auto-generated Static Analysis Rules

Authors:Fuwei Wang, Yongzhi Liu, Zhiqiang Dong
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In the open source software (OSS) ecosystem, there exists a complex software supply chain, where developers upstream and downstream widely borrow and reuse code. This results in the widespread occurrence of recurring defects, missing fixes, and propagation issues. These are collectively referred to as cognate defects, and their scale and threats have not received extensive attention and systematic research. Software composition analysis and code clone detection methods are unable to cover the various variant issues in the supply chain scenario, while code static analysis, or static application security testing (SAST) techniques struggle to target specific defects. In this paper, we propose a novel technique for detecting cognate defects in OSS through the automatic generation of SAST rules. Specifically, it extracts key syntax and semantic information from pre- and post-patch versions of code through structural comparison and control flow to data flow analysis, and generates rules that matches these key elements. We have implemented a prototype tool called Patch2QL and applied it to fundamental OSS in C/C++. In experiments, we discovered 7 new vulnerabilities with medium to critical severity in the most popular upstream software, as well as numerous potential security issues. When analyzing downstream projects in the supply chain, we found a significant number of representative cognate defects, clarifying the threat posed by this issue. Additionally, compared to general-purpose SAST and signature-based mechanisms, the generated rules perform better at discover all variants of cognate defects.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2401.12443 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:2401.12443v2 [cs.CR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.12443

Submission history

From: Fuwei Wang [view email]
[v1] Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:23:11 UTC (219 KB)
[v2] Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:23:12 UTC (215 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CR

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)