Mathematics > Numerical Analysis
[Submitted on 11 Dec 2024 (v1), last revised 9 Jan 2025 (this version, v2)]
Title:Scaling Optimized Hermite Approximation Methods
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Hermite polynomials and functions have extensive applications in scientific and engineering problems. While it is recognized that employing the scaled Hermite functions rather than the standard ones can remarkably enhance the approximation performance, the understanding of the scaling factor remains insufficient. Due to the lack of theoretical analysis, some literature still cast doubts on whether the Hermite spectral method is inferior to other methods. To dispel these doubts, we show in this article that the inefficiency of the Hermite spectral method comes from the imbalance in the decay speed of the objective function within the spatial and frequency domains. Moreover, proper scaling can render the Hermite spectral methods comparable to other methods. To illustrate this idea in more detail, we propose a novel error analysis framework for the scaled Hermite approximation. Taking the $L^2$ projection error as an example, our framework illustrates that there are three different components of errors: the spatial truncation error, the frequency truncation error, and the Hermite spectral approximation error. Through this perspective, finding the optimal scaling factor is equivalent to balancing the spatial and frequency truncation error. As applications, we show that geometric convergence can be recovered by proper scaling for a class of functions. Furthermore, we show that proper scaling can double the convergence order for smooth functions with algebraic decay. The perplexing pre-asymptotic sub-geometric convergence when approximating algebraic decay functions can be perfectly explained by this framework.
Submission history
From: Haijun Yu [view email][v1] Wed, 11 Dec 2024 02:48:41 UTC (211 KB)
[v2] Thu, 9 Jan 2025 02:06:02 UTC (209 KB)
Current browse context:
math.NA
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.