Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 13 Aug 2024 (v1), last revised 24 Sep 2024 (this version, v2)]
Title:Count on Your Elders: Laplace vs Gaussian Noise
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:In recent years, Gaussian noise has become a popular tool in differentially private algorithms, often replacing Laplace noise which dominated the early literature on differential privacy. Gaussian noise is the standard approach to $\textit{approximate}$ differential privacy, often resulting in much higher utility than traditional (pure) differential privacy mechanisms. In this paper we argue that Laplace noise may in fact be preferable to Gaussian noise in many settings, in particular when we seek to achieve $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-differential privacy for small values of $\delta$. We consider two scenarios:
First, we consider the problem of counting under continual observation and present a new generalization of the binary tree mechanism that uses a $k$-ary number system with $\textit{negative digits}$ to improve the privacy-accuracy trade-off. Our mechanism uses Laplace noise and improves the mean squared error over all ``optimal'' $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-differentially private factorization mechanisms based on Gaussian noise whenever $\delta$ is sufficiently small. Specifically, using $k=19$ we get an asymptotic improvement over the bound given in the work by Henzinger, Upadhyay and Upadhyay (SODA 2023) when $\delta = O(T^{-0.92})$.
Second, we show that the noise added by the Gaussian mechanism can always be replaced by Laplace noise of comparable variance for the same $(\epsilon, \delta)$ privacy guarantee, and in fact for sufficiently small $\delta$ the variance of the Laplace noise becomes strictly better. This challenges the conventional wisdom that Gaussian noise should be used for high-dimensional noise.
Submission history
From: Joel Daniel Andersson [view email][v1] Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:36:33 UTC (235 KB)
[v2] Tue, 24 Sep 2024 13:15:47 UTC (112 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.