Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms
[Submitted on 15 Jul 2024]
Title:Cut-Preserving Vertex Sparsifiers for Planar and Quasi-bipartite Graphs
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:We study vertex sparsification for preserving cuts. Given a graph $G$ with a subset $|T|=k$ of its vertices called terminals, a \emph{quality-$q$ cut sparsifier} is a graph $G'$ that contains $T$, such that, for any partition $(T_1,T_2)$ of $T$ into non-empty subsets, the value of the min-cut in $G'$ separating $T_1$ from $T_2$ is within factor $q$ from the value of the min-cut in $G$ separating $T_1$ from $T_2$. The construction of cut sparsifiers with good (small) quality and size has been a central problem in graph compression for years.
Planar graphs and quasi-bipartite graphs are two important special families studied in this research direction. The main results in this paper are new cut sparsifier constructions for them in the high-quality regime (where $q=1$ or $1+\varepsilon$ for small $\varepsilon>0$).
We first show that every planar graph admits a planar quality-$(1+\varepsilon)$ cut sparsifier of size $\tilde O(k/\text{poly}(\varepsilon))$, which is in sharp contrast with the lower bound of $2^{\Omega(k)}$ for the quality-$1$ case.
We then show that every quasi-bipartite graph admits a quality-$1$ cut sparsifier of size $2^{\tilde O(k^2)}$. This is the second to improve over the doubly-exponential bound for general graphs (previously only planar graphs have been shown to have single-exponential size quality-$1$ cut sparsifiers).
Lastly, we show that contraction, a common approach for constructing cut sparsifiers adopted in most previous works, does not always give optimal bounds for cut sparsifiers. We demonstrate this by showing that the optimal size bound for quality-$(1+\varepsilon)$ contraction-based cut sparsifiers for quasi-bipartite graphs lies in the range $[k^{\tilde\Omega(1/\varepsilon)},k^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)}]$, while in previous work an upper bound of $\tilde O(k/\varepsilon^2)$ was achieved via a non-contraction approach.
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.