Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 23 Jun 2024 (v1), last revised 18 Jul 2024 (this version, v2)]
Title:Exploring the difficulty of estimating win probability: a simulation study
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Estimating win probability is one of the classic modeling tasks of sports analytics. Many widely used win probability estimators are statistical win probability models, which fit the relationship between a binary win/loss outcome variable and certain game-state variables using data-driven regression or machine learning approaches. To illustrate just how difficult it is to accurately fit a statistical win probability model from noisy and highly correlated observational data, in this paper we conduct a simulation study. We create a simplified random walk version of football in which true win probability at each game-state is known, and we see how well a model recovers it. We find that the dependence structure of observational play-by-play data substantially inflates the bias and variance of estimators and lowers the effective sample size. This makes it essential to quantify uncertainty in win probability estimates, but typical bootstrapped confidence intervals are too narrow and don't achieve nominal coverage. Hence, we introduce a novel method, the fractional bootstrap, to calibrate these intervals to achieve adequate coverage.
Submission history
From: Ryan Brill [view email][v1] Sun, 23 Jun 2024 17:25:36 UTC (1,014 KB)
[v2] Thu, 18 Jul 2024 20:34:02 UTC (1,014 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ME
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.