Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods
[Submitted on 31 May 2024]
Title:Reliability for Nerve Fiber Layer Reflectance Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
View PDFAbstract:Purpose: Reliability for Nerve Fiber Layer Reflectance Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Methods: The study utilized OCT to scan participants with a cubic 6x6 mm disc scan. NFL reflectance were normalized by the average of bands below NFL and summarized. We selected several reference bands, including the pigment epithelium complex (PPEC), the band between NFL and Bruch's membrane (Post-NFL), and the top 50% of pixels with higher values were selected from the Post-NFL band by Post-NFL-Bright. Especially, we also included NFL attenuation coefficient (AC), which was equivalent to NFL reflectance normalized by all pixels below NFL. An experiment was designed to test the NFL reflectance against different levels of attenuation using neutral density filter (NDF). We also evaluated the within-visit and between-visit repeatability using a clinical dataset with normal and glaucoma eyes. Results: The experiment enrolled 20 healthy participants. The clinical dataset selected 22 normal and 55 glaucoma eyes with at least two visits form functional and structural OCT (FSOCT) study. The experiment showed that NFL reflectance normalized PPEC Max and Post-NFL-Bright had lowest dependence, slope=-0.77 and -1.34 dB/optical density on NDF levels, respectively. The clinical data showed that the NFL reflectance metrics normalized by Post-NFL-Bright or Post-NFL-Mean metrics had a trend of better repeatability and reproducibility than others, but the trend was not significant. All metrics demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy (0.82-0.87), but Post-NFL-Bright provide the best result. Conclusions: The NFL reflectance normalized by the maximum in PPEC had less dependence of the global attenuation followed by Post-NFL-Bright, PPEC/Mean, Post-NFL-Mean and NFL/AC. But NFL reflectance normalized by Post-NFL-Bright had better result in two datasets.
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.