Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Other Statistics

arXiv:2403.14883 (stat)
[Submitted on 21 Mar 2024 (v1), last revised 21 May 2024 (this version, v3)]

Title:Why Name Popularity is a Good Test of Historicity

Authors:Luuk van de Weghe, Jason Wilson
View PDF
Abstract:Are name statistics in the Gospels and Acts a good test of historicity? Kamil Gregor and Brian Blais, in a recent article in The Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus, argue that the sample of name occurrences in the Gospels and Acts is too small to be determinative and that several statistical anomalies weigh against a positive verdict. Unfortunately, their conclusions result directly from improper testing and questionable data selection. Chi-squared goodness-of-fit testing establishes that name occurrences in the Gospels and Acts fit into their historical context at least as good as those in the works of Josephus. Additionally, they fit better than occurrences derived from ancient fictional sources and occurrences from modern, well-researched historical novels.
Comments: 26 pages; 4 figures; 4 tables; data and supplementary materials at this https URL this is the version accepted for publication in the Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus, in our formatting, which is permitted by the publisher
Subjects: Other Statistics (stat.OT)
Cite as: arXiv:2403.14883 [stat.OT]
  (or arXiv:2403.14883v3 [stat.OT] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.14883

Submission history

From: Jason Wilson Ph.D [view email]
[v1] Thu, 21 Mar 2024 23:35:10 UTC (597 KB)
[v2] Thu, 16 May 2024 16:54:49 UTC (681 KB)
[v3] Tue, 21 May 2024 17:40:35 UTC (632 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
stat.OT
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-03
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)