Computer Science > Computers and Society
[Submitted on 13 Feb 2024 (v1), revised 11 Apr 2024 (this version, v3), latest version 17 Apr 2024 (v4)]
Title:Epistemic Power, Objectivity and Gender in AI Ethics Labor: Legitimizing Located Complaints
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:What counts as legitimate AI ethics labor, and consequently, what are the epistemic terms on which AI ethics claims are rendered legitimate? Based on 75 interviews with technologists including researchers, developers, open source contributors, and activists, this paper explores the various epistemic bases from which AI ethics is discussed and practiced. In the context of outside attacks on AI ethics as an impediment to "progress," I show how some AI ethics practices have reached toward authority from automation and quantification, and achieved some legitimacy as a result, while those based on richly embodied and situated lived experience have not. This paper draws together the work of feminist Anthropology and Science and Technology Studies scholars Diana Forsythe and Lucy Suchman with the works of postcolonial feminist theorist Sara Ahmed and Black feminist theorist Kristie Dotson to examine the implications of dominant AI ethics practices.
By entrenching the epistemic power of quantification, dominant AI ethics practices-Model Cards and similar interventions-risk legitimizing AI ethics as a project in equal and opposite measure to which they delegitimize and marginalize embodied and lived experiences as legitimate parts of the same project. In response, I propose humble technical practices: quantified or technical practices which specifically seek to make their epistemic limits clear in order to flatten hierarchies of epistemic power.
Submission history
From: David Widder [view email][v1] Tue, 13 Feb 2024 02:07:03 UTC (105 KB)
[v2] Wed, 10 Apr 2024 01:27:21 UTC (110 KB)
[v3] Thu, 11 Apr 2024 01:19:03 UTC (110 KB)
[v4] Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:34:09 UTC (109 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.