Statistics > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 29 Sep 2023 (this version), latest version 31 Oct 2024 (v4)]
Title:Controlling Continuous Relaxation for Combinatorial Optimization
View PDFAbstract:Recent advancements in combinatorial optimization (CO) problems emphasize the potential of graph neural networks (GNNs). The physics-inspired GNN (PI-GNN) solver, which finds approximate solutions through unsupervised learning, has attracted significant attention for large-scale CO problems. Nevertheless, there has been limited discussion on the performance of the PI-GNN solver for CO problems on relatively dense graphs where the performance of greedy algorithms worsens. In addition, since the PI-GNN solver employs a relaxation strategy, an artificial transformation from the continuous space back to the original discrete space is necessary after learning, potentially undermining the robustness of the solutions. This paper numerically demonstrates that the PI-GNN solver can be trapped in a local solution, where all variables are zero, in the early stage of learning for CO problems on the dense graphs. Then, we address these problems by controlling the continuity and discreteness of relaxed variables while avoiding the local solution: (i) introducing a new penalty term that controls the continuity and discreteness of the relaxed variables and eliminates the local solution; (ii) proposing a new continuous relaxation annealing (CRA) strategy. This new annealing first prioritizes continuous solutions and intensifies exploration by leveraging the continuity while avoiding the local solution and then schedules the penalty term for prioritizing a discrete solution until the relaxed variables are almost discrete values, which eliminates the need for an artificial transformation from the continuous to the original discrete space. Empirically, better results are obtained for CO problems on the dense graphs, where the PI-GNN solver struggles to find reasonable solutions, and for those on relatively sparse graphs. Furthermore, the computational time scaling is identical to that of the PI-GNN solver.
Submission history
From: Yuma Ichikawa [view email][v1] Fri, 29 Sep 2023 04:23:58 UTC (4,467 KB)
[v2] Sat, 3 Feb 2024 15:42:34 UTC (2,936 KB)
[v3] Sat, 25 May 2024 04:15:04 UTC (3,759 KB)
[v4] Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:21:32 UTC (3,764 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ML
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.