Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:2308.03597 (stat)
[Submitted on 7 Aug 2023]

Title:Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis

Authors:Chinyereugo M Umemneku-Chikere, Lorna Wheaton, Heather Poad, Devleena Ray, Ilse Cuevas Andrade, Sam Khan, Paul Tappenden, Keith R Abrams, Rhiannon K Owen, Sylwia Bujkiewicz
View PDF
Abstract:Objective: We aimed to develop a meta-analytic model for evaluation of predictive biomarkers and targeted therapies, utilising data from digital sources when individual participant data (IPD) from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are unavailable.
Methods: A Bayesian network meta-regression model, combining aggregate data (AD) from RCTs and IPD, was developed for modelling time-to-event data to evaluate predictive biomarkers. IPD were sourced from electronic health records, using target trial emulation approach, or digitised Kaplan-Meier curves. The model is illustrated using two examples; breast cancer with a hormone receptor biomarker, and metastatic colorectal cancer with the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) biomarker.
Results: The model developed allowed for estimation of treatment effects in two subgroups of patients defined by their biomarker status. Effectiveness of taxane did not differ in hormone receptor positive and negative breast cancer patients. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors were more effective than chemotherapy in KRAS wild type colorectal cancer patients but not in patients with KRAS mutant status. Use of IPD reduced uncertainty of the sub-group specific treatment effect estimates by up to 49%.
Conclusion: Utilisation of IPD allowed for more detailed evaluation of predictive biomarkers and cancer therapies and improved precision of the estimates compared to use of AD alone.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:2308.03597 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2308.03597v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.03597

Submission history

From: Sylwia Bujkiewicz [view email]
[v1] Mon, 7 Aug 2023 13:59:07 UTC (609 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-08
Change to browse by:
stat
stat.AP

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)