Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Computers and Society

arXiv:2306.04325 (cs)
[Submitted on 7 Jun 2023 (v1), last revised 12 Aug 2024 (this version, v5)]

Title:Last Week with ChatGPT: A Weibo Study on Social Perspective Regarding ChatGPT for Education and Beyond

Authors:Yao Tian, Chengwei Tong, Lik-Hang Lee, Reza Hadi Mogavi, Yong Liao, Pengyuan Zhou
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The application of AI-powered tools has piqued the interest of many fields, particularly in the academic community. This study uses ChatGPT, currently the most powerful and popular AI tool, as a representative example to analyze how the Chinese public perceives the potential of large language models (LLMs) for educational and general purposes. Although facing accessibility challenges, we found that the number of discussions on ChatGPT per month is 16 times that of Ernie Bot developed by Baidu, the most popular alternative product to ChatGPT in the mainland, making ChatGPT a more suitable subject for our analysis. The study also serves as the first effort to investigate the changes in public opinion as AI technologies become more advanced and intelligent. The analysis reveals that, upon first encounters with advanced AI that was not yet highly capable, some social media users believed that AI advancements would benefit education and society, while others feared that advanced AI, like ChatGPT, would make humans feel inferior and lead to problems such as cheating and a decline in moral principles. The majority of users remained neutral. Interestingly, with the rapid development and improvement of AI capabilities, public attitudes have tended to shift in a positive direction. We present a thorough analysis of the trending shift and a roadmap to ensure the ethical application of ChatGPT-like models in education and beyond.
Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
Cite as: arXiv:2306.04325 [cs.CY]
  (or arXiv:2306.04325v5 [cs.CY] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.04325

Submission history

From: Yao Tian [view email]
[v1] Wed, 7 Jun 2023 10:45:02 UTC (2,228 KB)
[v2] Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:14:00 UTC (925 KB)
[v3] Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:48:02 UTC (1,052 KB)
[v4] Fri, 31 May 2024 17:25:30 UTC (1,067 KB)
[v5] Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:38:11 UTC (1,067 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
cs.HC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CY

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)