Computer Science > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 6 Jun 2023 (this version), latest version 8 Sep 2023 (v2)]
Title:Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations
View PDFAbstract:Federated Learning (FL) trains machine learning models on data distributed across multiple devices, avoiding data transfer to a central location. This improves privacy, reduces communication costs, and enhances model performance. However, FL is prone to poisoning attacks, which can be untargeted aiming to reduce the model performance, or targeted, so-called backdoors, which add adversarial behavior that can be triggered with appropriately crafted inputs. Striving for stealthiness, backdoor attacks are harder to deal with.
Mitigation techniques against poisoning attacks rely on monitoring certain metrics and filtering malicious model updates. However, previous works didn't consider real-world adversaries and data distributions. To support our statement, we define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries that can simultaneously adapt to multiple objectives and demonstrate through extensive tests, that existing defense methods can be circumvented in this adversary model. We also demonstrate, that existing defenses have limited effectiveness when no assumptions are made about underlying data distributions.
To address realistic scenarios and adversary models, we propose Metric-Cascades (MESAS) a new defense that leverages multiple detection metrics simultaneously for the filtering of poisoned model updates. This approach forces adaptive attackers into a heavy multi-objective optimization problem, and our evaluation with nine backdoors and three datasets shows that even our strong adaptive attacker cannot evade MESAS's detection. We show that MESAS outperforms existing defenses in distinguishing backdoors from distortions originating from different data distributions within and across the clients. Overall, MESAS is the first defense that is robust against strong adaptive adversaries and is effective in real-world data scenarios while introducing a low overhead of 24.37s on average.
Submission history
From: Torsten Krauß [view email][v1] Tue, 6 Jun 2023 11:44:42 UTC (1,290 KB)
[v2] Fri, 8 Sep 2023 11:42:32 UTC (1,424 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.