Statistics > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 9 May 2023 (v1), last revised 14 Oct 2024 (this version, v2)]
Title:A duality framework for analyzing random feature and two-layer neural networks
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:We consider the problem of learning functions within the $\mathcal{F}_{p,\pi}$ and Barron spaces, which play crucial roles in understanding random feature models (RFMs), two-layer neural networks, as well as kernel methods. Leveraging tools from information-based complexity (IBC), we establish a dual equivalence between approximation and estimation, and then apply it to study the learning of the preceding function spaces. The duality allows us to focus on the more tractable problem between approximation and estimation. To showcase the efficacy of our duality framework, we delve into two important but under-explored problems:
1) Random feature learning beyond kernel regime: We derive sharp bounds for learning $\mathcal{F}_{p,\pi}$ using RFMs. Notably, the learning is efficient without the curse of dimensionality for $p>1$. This underscores the extended applicability of RFMs beyond the traditional kernel regime, since $\mathcal{F}_{p,\pi}$ with $p<2$ is strictly larger than the corresponding reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) where $p=2$.
2) The $L^\infty$ learning of RKHS: We establish sharp, spectrum-dependent characterizations for the convergence of $L^\infty$ learning error in both noiseless and noisy settings. Surprisingly, we show that popular kernel ridge regression can achieve near-optimal performance in $L^\infty$ learning, despite it primarily minimizing square loss.
To establish the aforementioned duality, we introduce a type of IBC, termed $I$-complexity, to measure the size of a function class. Notably, $I$-complexity offers a tight characterization of learning in noiseless settings, yields lower bounds comparable to Le Cam's in noisy settings, and is versatile in deriving upper bounds. We believe that our duality framework holds potential for broad application in learning analysis across more scenarios.
Submission history
From: Hongrui Chen [view email][v1] Tue, 9 May 2023 17:41:50 UTC (635 KB)
[v2] Mon, 14 Oct 2024 01:08:16 UTC (72 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ML
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.