Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies
[Submitted on 12 Oct 2022 (v1), last revised 17 Oct 2022 (this version, v2)]
Title:Novae in M51: a New, Much Higher Rate from Multi-epoch HST Data
View PDFAbstract:Accurate determination of the rates of nova eruptions in different kinds of galaxies give us strong constraints on those galaxies' underlying white dwarf and binary populations, and those stars' spatial distributions. Until 2016, limitations inherent in ground-based surveys of external galaxies - and dust extinction in the Milky Way - significantly hampered the determination of those rates and how much they differ between different types of galaxies. Infrared Galactic surveys and dense cadence Hubble Space Telescope (HST)-based surveys are overcoming these limitations, leading to sharply increased nova-in-galaxy rates relative to those previously claimed. Here we present 14 nova candidates that were serendipitously observed during a year-long HST survey of the massive spiral galaxy M51 (the "Whirlpool Galaxy"). We use simulations based on observed nova light curves to model the incompleteness of the HST survey in unprecedented detail, determining a nova detection efficiency $\epsilon = 20.3$ percent. The survey's M51 area coverage, combined with $\epsilon$, indicates a conservative M51 nova rate of $172^{+46}_{-37}$ novae yr$^{-1}$, corresponding to a luminosity-specific nova rate (LSNR) of $\sim10.4^{+2.8}_{-2.2}$ novae yr$^{-1}$/$10^{10} L_{\odot,K}$. Both these rates are approximately an order of magnitude higher than those estimated by ground-based studies, contradicting claims of universal low nova rates in all types of galaxies determined by low cadence, ground-based surveys. They demonstrate that, contrary to theoretical models, the HST-determined LSNR in a giant elliptical galaxy (M87) and a giant spiral galaxy (M51) likely do not differ by an order of magnitude or more, and may in fact be quite similar.
Submission history
From: Shifra Mandel [view email][v1] Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:01:50 UTC (2,190 KB)
[v2] Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:03:22 UTC (2,190 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.