Mathematics > Statistics Theory
[Submitted on 5 Oct 2022]
Title:Constant regret for sequence prediction with limited advice
View PDFAbstract:We investigate the problem of cumulative regret minimization for individual sequence prediction with respect to the best expert in a finite family of size K under limited access to information. We assume that in each round, the learner can predict using a convex combination of at most p experts for prediction, then they can observe a posteriori the losses of at most m experts. We assume that the loss function is range-bounded and exp-concave. In the standard multi-armed bandits setting, when the learner is allowed to play only one expert per round and observe only its feedback, known optimal regret bounds are of the order O($\sqrt$ KT). We show that allowing the learner to play one additional expert per round and observe one additional feedback improves substantially the guarantees on regret. We provide a strategy combining only p = 2 experts per round for prediction and observing m $\ge$ 2 experts' losses. Its randomized regret (wrt. internal randomization of the learners' strategy) is of order O (K/m) log(K$\delta$ --1) with probability 1 -- $\delta$, i.e., is independent of the horizon T ("constant" or "fast rate" regret) if (p $\ge$ 2 and m $\ge$ 3). We prove that this rate is optimal up to a logarithmic factor in K. In the case p = m = 2, we provide an upper bound of order O(K 2 log(K$\delta$ --1)), with probability 1 -- $\delta$. Our strategies do not require any prior knowledge of the horizon T nor of the confidence parameter $\delta$. Finally, we show that if the learner is constrained to observe only one expert feedback per round, the worst-case regret is the "slow rate" $\Omega$($\sqrt$ KT), suggesting that synchronous observation of at least two experts per round is necessary to have a constant regret.
Submission history
From: El Mehdi Saad [view email] [via CCSD proxy][v1] Wed, 5 Oct 2022 13:32:49 UTC (46 KB)
Current browse context:
math.ST
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.