Computer Science > Computers and Society
[Submitted on 23 Aug 2022 (v1), revised 13 Dec 2022 (this version, v2), latest version 14 Jun 2023 (v3)]
Title:From alternative conceptions of honesty to alternative facts in communications by U.S. politicians
View PDFAbstract:The spread of online misinformation is increasingly perceived as a problem for societal cohesion and democracy. Much attention has focused on the role of social media as a vector of misinformation. The role of political leaders has attracted less research attention, even though leaders demonstrably influence media coverage and public opinion, and even though politicians who "speak their mind" are perceived by segments of the public as authentic and honest even if their statements are unsupported by evidence or facts. Here we show that in the last decade, U.S. politicians' conception of truth has undergone a distinct shift, with authentic but evidence-free belief-speaking becoming more prominent and more differentiated from evidence-based truth seeking. We analyze communications by members of the U.S. Congress on Twitter between 2011 and 2022 and show that political speech has fractured into two distinct components related to belief-speaking and evidence-based truth-seeking, respectively, and that belief-speaking, but not truth-seeking, can be associated with the sharing of untrustworthy information. We show that in tweets by conservative members of Congress, an increase in belief-speaking of 10% is associated with a decrease of 13.7 points of quality (using the NewsGuard scoring system) in the sources shared in a tweet. In addition, we find that an increase of belief-speaking language by 10% in the shared articles themselves is associated with a drop in NewsGuard score of 7.9 points for members of both parties. By contrast, increase in truth-seeking language in tweets and articles is associated with an increase in quality of sources. The results support the hypothesis that the current dissemination of misinformation in political discourse is in part driven by a new understanding of truth and honesty that has replaced reliance on evidence with the invocation of subjective belief.
Submission history
From: David Garcia [view email][v1] Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:59:32 UTC (1,940 KB)
[v2] Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:23:26 UTC (7,681 KB)
[v3] Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:51:37 UTC (5,163 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.