Physics > Computational Physics
[Submitted on 12 Aug 2022 (this version), latest version 8 Nov 2022 (v3)]
Title:How good are recent density functionals for ground and excited states of one-electron systems?
View PDFAbstract:M. G. Medvedev et al. [Science 355, 49 (2017)] and K. Kepp [Science 356, 496 (2017)] initiated a discussion about the ability of recent density functional approximations (DFAs) to deliver a correct electron density in addition to a correct total energy. Motivated by self-interaction corrected density functional calculations on many-electron systems, we extend this discussion to the exactly solvable $1s$, $2p$, and $3d$ states of hydrogenic one-electron cations and demonstrate that state-of-the-art DFAs exhibit large errors for the $2p$ and $3d$ excited states. We consider 56 functionals at the local density approximation (LDA), generalized gradient approximation (GGA) as well as meta-GGA levels, also including several hybrid functionals like the recently proposed machine-learned DM21 local hybrid functional. The best non-hybrid functional for the $1s$ ground state is revTPSS. The $2p$ and $3d$ excited states are more difficult for DFAs and surprisingly, LDA functionals turn out to yield the most systematic accuracy for these states amongst pure i.e. non-hybrid functionals. The best performance for the $1s$, $2p$, and $3d$ states overall is observed with the BHandH global hybrid GGA functional, which contains 50% of Hartree--Fock exchange and 50% LDA exchange. The performance of DM21 is found to be inconsistent, yielding good accuracy for some states and systems and poor accuracy for others. Based on these results, we recommend including a variety of one-electron cations in future training of machine-learned density functionals.
Submission history
From: Sebastian Schwalbe [view email][v1] Fri, 12 Aug 2022 20:00:34 UTC (726 KB)
[v2] Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:19:48 UTC (728 KB)
[v3] Tue, 8 Nov 2022 09:40:26 UTC (727 KB)
Current browse context:
physics.comp-ph
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.