Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods

arXiv:2208.05228 (q-bio)
[Submitted on 10 Aug 2022]

Title:Current and perspective sensing methods for monkeypox virus: a reemerging zoonosis in its infancy

Authors:Ijaz Gul, Changyue Liu, Yuan Xi, Zhicheng Du, Shiyao Zhai, Zhengyang Lei, Chen Qun, Muhammad Akmal Raheem, Qian He, Zhang Haihui, Canyang Zhang, Runming Wang, Sanyang Han, Du Ke, Peiwu Qin
View PDF
Abstract:Objectives The review is dedicated to evaluate the current monkeypox virus (MPXV) detection methods, discuss their pros and cons, and provide recommended solutions to the problems.
Methods The literature for this review is identified through searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, and Science Direct advanced search for articles published in English without any start date until June, 2022, by use of the terms "monkeypox virus" or "poxvirus" along with "diagnosis"; "PCR"; "real-time PCR"; "LAMP"; "RPA"; "immunoassay"; "reemergence"; "biothreat"; "endemic", and "multi-country outbreak" and also, by tracking citations of the relevant papers. The most relevant articles are included in the review.
Results Our literature review shows that PCR is the gold standard method for MPXV detection. In addition, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) have been reported as alternatives to PCR. Immunodiagnostics, whole particle detection, and image-based detection are the non-nucleic acid-based MPXV detection modalities.
Conclusions PCR is easy to leverage and adapt for a quick response to an outbreak, but the PCR-based MPXV detection approaches may not be suitable for marginalized settings. Limited progress has been made towards innovations in MPXV diagnostics, providing room for the development of novel detection techniques for this virus.
Comments: 36 pages, 5 figures, 1 table
Subjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Biomolecules (q-bio.BM)
Cite as: arXiv:2208.05228 [q-bio.QM]
  (or arXiv:2208.05228v1 [q-bio.QM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.05228

Submission history

From: Ijaz Gul [view email]
[v1] Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:03:02 UTC (1,805 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
q-bio.BM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-08
Change to browse by:
q-bio
q-bio.QM

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)