Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory
[Submitted on 8 Apr 2022 (v1), last revised 1 May 2023 (this version, v4)]
Title:Stable Matching: Choosing Which Proposals to Make
View PDFAbstract:To guarantee all agents are matched in general, the classic Deferred Acceptance algorithm needs complete preference lists. In practice, preference lists are short, yet stable matching still works well. This raises two questions:
$\bullet$ Why does it work well?
$\bullet$ Which proposals should agents include in their preference lists?
We study these questions in a model, introduced by Lee [17], with preferences based on correlated cardinal utilities: these utilities are based on common public ratings of each agent together with individual private adjustments. Lee showed that for suitable utility functions, in large markets, with high probability, for most agents, all stable matchings yield similar valued utilities. By means of a new analysis, we strengthen Lee's result, showing that in large markets, with high probability, for $\it all$ but the agents with the lowest public ratings, all stable matchings yield similar valued utilities. We can then deduce that for $\it all$ but the agents with the lowest public ratings, each agent has an easily identified length $O(\log n)$ preference list that includes all of its stable matches, addressing the second question above. We note that this identification uses an initial communication phase.
We extend these results to settings where the two sides have unequal numbers of agents, to many-to-one settings, e.g. employers and workers, and we also show the existence of an $\epsilon$-Bayes-Nash equilibrium in which every agent makes relatively few proposals. These results all rely on a new technique for sidestepping the conditioning between the tentative matching events that occur over the course of a run of the Deferred Acceptance algorithm. We complement these theoretical results with an experimental study.
Submission history
From: Ishan Agarwal [view email][v1] Fri, 8 Apr 2022 16:15:11 UTC (2,226 KB)
[v2] Wed, 20 Jul 2022 19:54:43 UTC (636 KB)
[v3] Wed, 9 Nov 2022 18:26:55 UTC (642 KB)
[v4] Mon, 1 May 2023 12:40:12 UTC (868 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.