Physics > Fluid Dynamics
[Submitted on 7 Apr 2022]
Title:Comparison of Sub-Grid Scale Models for Large-Eddy Simulation using a High-Order Spectral Element Approximation of the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations at Low Mach Number
View PDFAbstract:This study aims to identify the properties, advantages, and drawbacks of some common (and some less common) sub-grid scale (SGS) models for large eddy simulation of low Mach compressible flows using high order spectral elements. The models investigated are the classical constant coefficient Smagorinsky-Lilly, the model by Vreman and two variants of a dynamic SGS (DSGS) model designed to stabilize finite and spectral elements for transport dominated problems. In particular, we compare one variant of DSGS that is based on a time-dependent residual version (R-DSGS) in contrast to a time-independent residual based scheme (T-DSGS). The SGS models are compared against the reference model by Smagorinsky and Lilly for their ability to: (i) stabilize the numerical solution, (ii) minimize undershoots and overshoots, (iii) capture/preserve discontinuities, and (iv) transfer energy across different length scales. These abilities are investigated on problems for: (1) passively advected tracers, (2) coupled, nonlinear system of equations exhibiting discontinuities, (3) gravity-driven flows in a stratified atmosphere, and (4) homogenous, isotropic turbulence. All models were able to preserve sharp discontinuities. Vreman and the R-DSGS models also reduce the undershoots and overshoots in the solution of linear and non-linear advection with sharp gradients. Our analysis shows that the R-DSGS and T-DSGS models are more robust than Vreman and Smagorinsky-Lilly for numerical stabilization of high-order spectral methods. The Smagorinsky and Vreman models are better able to resolve the finer flow structures in shear flows, while the nodal R-DSGS model shows better energy conservation. Overall, the nodal implementation of R-DSGS (in contrast to its element-based counterpart) is shown to outperform the other SGS models in most metrics listed above, and on par with respect to the remaining ones.
Current browse context:
physics.flu-dyn
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.