Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 23 Mar 2022 (this version), latest version 29 Jan 2023 (v2)]
Title:A Computationally Efficient Approach to Fully Bayesian Benchmarking
View PDFAbstract:In small area estimation, it is often necessary to resort to model-based methods in order to produce estimates in areas with little or no data. In many settings, we require that some aggregate of small area estimates agree with a national level estimate that may be considered more reliable, for internal consistency purposes. The process of enforcing this agreement is referred to as benchmarking, and while methods currently exist to perform benchmarking in many settings, few are ideal for applications with non-normal outcomes and many are computationally inefficient. Fully Bayesian benchmarking is a theoretically appealing approach insofar as we can obtain posterior distributions conditional on a benchmarking constraint. However, existing implementations are often computationally prohibitive. In this paper, we summarize existing benchmarking methods and their shortcomings in the setting of small area estimation with binary outcomes, and propose an approach in which an unbenchmarked method that produces samples can be combined with a rejection sampler to produce fully Bayesian benchmarked estimates in a computationally efficient way. To illustrate our approach, we provide comparisons of various benchmarking methods in applications to HIV prevalence and under-5 mortality estimation. Code implementing our methodology is available in the R package simultBench.
Submission history
From: Taylor Okonek [view email][v1] Wed, 23 Mar 2022 05:06:29 UTC (34,852 KB)
[v2] Sun, 29 Jan 2023 00:04:17 UTC (32,836 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ME
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.