Computer Science > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 31 Jan 2022 (v1), revised 25 Mar 2022 (this version, v4), latest version 7 Jun 2024 (v8)]
Title:Deep discriminative to kernel generative modeling
View PDFAbstract:The fight between discriminative versus generative goes deep, in both the study of artificial and natural intelligence. In our view, both camps have complementary value, so, we sought to synergistic combine them. Here, we propose a methodology to convert deep discriminative networks to kernel generative networks. We leveraged the fact that deep models, including both random forests and deep networks, learn internal representations which are unions of polytopes with affine activation functions to conceptualize them both as generalized partitioning rules. From that perspective, we used foundational results on the relationship between histogram rules and kernel density estimators to obtain class conditional kernel density estimators from the deep models. We then studied the trade-offs we observed from implementing this strategy in low-dimensional settings, both theoretically and empirically, as a first step towards understanding. Theoretically, we show conditions under which our generative models are more efficient than the corresponding discriminative approaches. Empirically, when sample sizes are relatively high, the discriminative models tend to perform as well or better on discriminative metrics, such as classification rates and posterior calibration. However, when sample sizes are relatively low, the generative models outperform the discriminative ones even on discriminative metrics. Moreover, the generative ones can also sample from the distribution, obtain smoother posteriors, and extrapolate beyond the convex hull of the training data to handle OOD inputs more reasonably. Via human experiments we illustrate that our kernel generative networks (Kragen) behave more like humans than deep discriminative networks. We believe this approach may be an important step in unifying the thinking and approaches across the discriminative and generative divide.
Submission history
From: Jayanta Dey [view email][v1] Mon, 31 Jan 2022 05:07:16 UTC (16,278 KB)
[v2] Sun, 6 Feb 2022 14:38:23 UTC (16,262 KB)
[v3] Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:14:47 UTC (16,263 KB)
[v4] Fri, 25 Mar 2022 03:41:23 UTC (16,263 KB)
[v5] Fri, 19 May 2023 21:15:28 UTC (18,650 KB)
[v6] Thu, 19 Oct 2023 02:27:07 UTC (33,996 KB)
[v7] Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:57:20 UTC (33,151 KB)
[v8] Fri, 7 Jun 2024 17:10:00 UTC (32,931 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.LG
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.