Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Economics > General Economics

arXiv:2201.05574 (econ)
[Submitted on 14 Jan 2022 (v1), last revised 25 Apr 2023 (this version, v4)]

Title:Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security

Authors:Yulin Liu, Yuxuan Lu, Kartik Nayak, Fan Zhang, Luyao Zhang, Yinhong Zhao
View PDF
Abstract:A transaction fee mechanism (TFM) is an essential component of a blockchain protocol. However, a systematic evaluation of the real-world impact of TFMs is still absent. Using rich data from the Ethereum blockchain, the mempool, and exchanges, we study the effect of EIP-1559, one of the earliest-deployed TFMs that depart from the traditional first-price auction paradigm. We conduct a rigorous and comprehensive empirical study to examine its causal effect on blockchain transaction fee dynamics, transaction waiting times, and consensus security. Our results show that EIP-1559 improves the user experience by mitigating intrablock differences in the gas price paid and reducing users' waiting times. However, EIP-1559 has only a small effect on gas fee levels and consensus security. In addition, we find that when Ether's price is more volatile, the waiting time is significantly higher. We also verify that a larger block size increases the presence of siblings. These findings suggest new directions for improving TFMs.
Subjects: General Economics (econ.GN); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
Cite as: arXiv:2201.05574 [econ.GN]
  (or arXiv:2201.05574v4 [econ.GN] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.05574
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3548606.3559341

Submission history

From: Luyao Zhang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:33:39 UTC (4,509 KB)
[v2] Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:54:53 UTC (4,494 KB)
[v3] Sat, 3 Sep 2022 15:50:56 UTC (6,234 KB)
[v4] Tue, 25 Apr 2023 03:33:27 UTC (5,253 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
econ.GN
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CR
cs.DC
cs.GT
econ
q-fin
q-fin.EC

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)