Mathematics > General Mathematics
[Submitted on 1 Aug 2021 (v1), last revised 22 Mar 2024 (this version, v21)]
Title:A Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis Using Bombieri's Equivalence Theorem
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:The Riemann hypothesis states that the Riemann $\xi(s)$ function has no zeros in the strip $0< {\rm Re}(s) < 1$ except for the critical line where ${\rm Re}(s) = 1/2$. However, determining whether a point in the strip is a zero of a complex function is a challenging task. Bombieri proposed an assertion in the Official Problem Description that states, ``The Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the statement that all local maxima of $\xi(t)$ (namely $\xi(s)$ on the critical line) are positive and all local minima are negative." In this paper, we follow Bombieri's idea to study the Riemann hypothesis. First, we show that on the critical line, the $\xi(s)$ function (which is then a real function of a single real variable) obeys a special differential equation, such that it satisfies Bombieri's equivalence condition. Then, since we have been unable to locate the original proof of Bombieri's equivalence theorem, we independently provide a proof for the sufficiency part of it. Namely, if the $\xi(s)$ function satisfies Bombieri's equivalence condition on the critical line, then by the Cauchy-Riemann equations, it has no zeros outside this critical line. Thus, we can conclude that the Riemann hypothesis is true. Finally, we discuss Pólya's counterexample, which is against the use of Jensen's form of the $\xi(s)$ function to study the Riemann hypothesis. We show that this counterexample violates Bombieri's equivalence theorem.
Submission history
From: Xiao Lin [view email][v1] Sun, 1 Aug 2021 10:48:43 UTC (48 KB)
[v2] Sun, 12 Sep 2021 08:26:01 UTC (50 KB)
[v3] Sun, 10 Oct 2021 10:47:11 UTC (50 KB)
[v4] Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:45:47 UTC (50 KB)
[v5] Wed, 27 Oct 2021 02:26:03 UTC (51 KB)
[v6] Mon, 7 Feb 2022 04:36:39 UTC (74 KB)
[v7] Wed, 9 Feb 2022 06:32:52 UTC (72 KB)
[v8] Thu, 3 Mar 2022 07:40:05 UTC (74 KB)
[v9] Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:48:19 UTC (74 KB)
[v10] Sat, 7 May 2022 02:49:40 UTC (100 KB)
[v11] Tue, 31 May 2022 09:46:05 UTC (93 KB)
[v12] Wed, 15 Jun 2022 09:53:43 UTC (92 KB)
[v13] Tue, 21 Jun 2022 09:47:09 UTC (92 KB)
[v14] Wed, 29 Jun 2022 08:13:30 UTC (92 KB)
[v15] Thu, 28 Jul 2022 01:53:02 UTC (93 KB)
[v16] Thu, 4 Aug 2022 02:11:53 UTC (93 KB)
[v17] Sun, 20 Nov 2022 07:56:21 UTC (93 KB)
[v18] Tue, 28 Feb 2023 06:17:32 UTC (199 KB)
[v19] Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:46:28 UTC (201 KB)
[v20] Tue, 28 Mar 2023 11:16:04 UTC (202 KB)
[v21] Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:05:42 UTC (204 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.