Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory
[Submitted on 22 May 2021 (v1), revised 18 Sep 2021 (this version, v2), latest version 20 Apr 2023 (v4)]
Title:Nash-Bargaining-Based Models for Matching Markets, with Implementations and Experimental Results
View PDFAbstract:This paper addresses two deficiencies of models in the area of matching-based market design. The first arises from the recent realization that the most prominent solution that uses cardinal utilities, namely the Hylland-Zeckhauser (HZ) mechanism, is intractable; in particular, the problem of computing even an approximate equilibrium for it is PPAD-complete. The second is the extreme paucity of models that use cardinal utilities; this stands in sharp contrast with general equilibrium theory, which has defined and extensively studied several fundamental market models to address a number of specialized and realistic situations.
Our paper addresses both these issues by proposing Nash-bargaining-based matching market models. Since the Nash bargaining solution is captured by a convex program, efficiency follow; in addition, it possesses a number of desirable game-theoretic properties. Our approach yields a rich collection of models, not only for one-sided, but also two-sided, markets.
In order to be used in "industrial grade" applications, we demonstrate very fast implementations for these models. These are able to solve large instances, with $n = 2000$, in one hour on a PC, even for a two-sided matching market. A number of new ideas were needed, beyond the standard methods, to obtain these implementations. For matching market models with linear utilities, we use the Frank-Wolfe algorithm. For the more challenging models, with non-linear utility functions, we use the cutting-plane algorithm.
Submission history
From: Mojtaba Hosseini [view email][v1] Sat, 22 May 2021 12:16:01 UTC (39 KB)
[v2] Sat, 18 Sep 2021 23:21:03 UTC (79 KB)
[v3] Thu, 25 Nov 2021 01:01:49 UTC (300 KB)
[v4] Thu, 20 Apr 2023 20:04:15 UTC (912 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.