Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory
[Submitted on 21 May 2021 (v1), revised 8 Jun 2021 (this version, v2), latest version 20 May 2022 (v5)]
Title:When is Assortment Optimization Optimal?
View PDFAbstract:A classical question in economics is whether complex, randomized selling protocols can improve a firm's revenue beyond that of simple, take-it-or-leave-it posted prices. In 1981, Myerson answered this question with an emphatic ``No'' for a monopolist selling a single good. By contrast, there is no crisp answer for multiple goods, and a major focus of Bayesian mechanism design since then has been to understand the power of randomized lotteries over deterministic pricing in different settings.
In this paper, we ask the same question for assortment optimization, where goods have exogenously-fixed prices, and the decision is a set of substitute goods to offer. To formalize this question, we introduce a Bayesian mechanism design problem with fixed prices and ordinal preferences, in which assortments correspond to deterministic mechanisms. Meanwhile, randomized mechanisms correspond to lotteries whose payment is restricted to equal the fixed price of the randomly-allocated good. This models the ``fixed-price lotteries'' trending in designer fashion, a significant departure from traditional lotteries based on price discounts.
We first show that for general ordinal distributions, lotteries under this restriction can still earn greater revenue than any deterministic assortment. We then derive a natural sufficient condition on the distribution which ensures the optimality of assortments. Importantly, this sufficient condition captures commonly-used distributions in the assortment optimization literature, including Multi-Nomial Logit, Markov Chain, Tversky's Elimination by Aspects, and mixtures with Independent Demand Models. The takeaway is that unless a firm has a sophisticated model for consumer choice, fixed-price lotteries are no better than assortments.
Submission history
From: Will Ma [view email][v1] Fri, 21 May 2021 16:12:23 UTC (60 KB)
[v2] Tue, 8 Jun 2021 13:25:39 UTC (65 KB)
[v3] Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:18:23 UTC (87 KB)
[v4] Fri, 18 Feb 2022 04:14:05 UTC (87 KB)
[v5] Fri, 20 May 2022 16:37:09 UTC (85 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.