Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > Physics and Society

arXiv:2104.03067 (physics)
[Submitted on 7 Apr 2021 (v1), last revised 2 Feb 2022 (this version, v5)]

Title:Quantifying incentive (in)compatibility: A case study from sports

Authors:László Csató
View PDF
Abstract:For every sports tournament, it is an important requirement to provide contestants with the appropriate incentives to perform. However, incentive compatibility is usually considered an all or nothing (binary) concept in the academic literature, that is, the rules are proved to be either strategy-proof or vulnerable to manipulation. Our paper aims to present a method for quantifying the violation of this theoretical property through the example of the European Qualifiers for the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Even though that competition is known to be incentive incompatible since lower-ranked Nations League group winners are interested in the success of their higher-ranked peers, the extent of the problem has remained unexplored until now. Computer simulations reveal that the threat of tanking can be substantially mitigated by adding a carefully chosen set of draw restrictions, which offers a justifiable and transparent solution to improve fairness. Sports governing bodies are encouraged to take our findings into account.
Comments: 19 pages, 3 figures, 4 tables
Subjects: Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph); Applications (stat.AP)
MSC classes: 62F07, 90-10, 90B90, 91B14
Cite as: arXiv:2104.03067 [physics.soc-ph]
  (or arXiv:2104.03067v5 [physics.soc-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.03067
Journal reference: European Journal of Operational Research, 302(2): 717-726, 2022
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.01.042

Submission history

From: László Csató [view email]
[v1] Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:34:11 UTC (87 KB)
[v2] Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:18:01 UTC (85 KB)
[v3] Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:04:58 UTC (85 KB)
[v4] Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:16:21 UTC (86 KB)
[v5] Wed, 2 Feb 2022 11:01:27 UTC (86 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
physics.soc-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-04
Change to browse by:
physics
stat
stat.AP

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)