Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:2104.02665 (stat)
[Submitted on 6 Apr 2021]

Title:A new weighting method when not all the events are selected as cases in a nested case-control study

Authors:Qian M. Zhou, Xuan Wang, Yingye Zheng, Tianxi Cai
View PDF
Abstract:Nested case-control (NCC) is a sampling method widely used for developing and evaluating risk models with expensive biomarkers on large prospective cohort studies. The biomarker values are typically obtained on a sub-cohort, consisting of all the events and a subset of non-events. However, when the number of events is not small, it might not be affordable to measure the biomarkers on all of them. Due to the costs and limited availability of bio-specimens, only a subset of events is selected to the sub-cohort as cases. For these "untypical" NCC studies, we propose a new weighting method for the inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimation. We also design a perturbation method to estimate the variance of the IPW estimator with our new weights. It accounts for between-subject correlations induced by the sampling processes for both cases and controls through perturbing their sampling indicator variables, and thus, captures all the variations. Furthermore, we demonstrate, analytically and numerically, that when cases consist of only a subset of events, our new weight produces more efficient IPW estimators than the weight proposed in Samuelsen (1997) for a standard NCC design. We illustrate the estimating procedure with a study that aims to evaluate a biomarker-based risk prediction model using the Framingham cohort study.
Comments: 27 pages,3 figures, 5 tables
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2104.02665 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2104.02665v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.02665

Submission history

From: Michelle Zhou [view email]
[v1] Tue, 6 Apr 2021 16:53:59 UTC (63 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-04
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)