Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2103.13332 (cs)
This paper has been withdrawn by Johannes Stern Dr.
[Submitted on 24 Mar 2021 (v1), last revised 1 Apr 2021 (this version, v3)]

Title:Truth and Subjunctive Theories of Knowledge: No Luck?

Authors:Johannes Stern
No PDF available, click to view other formats
Abstract:The paper explores applications of Kripke's theory of truth to semantics for anti-luck epistemology, that is, to subjunctive theories of knowledge. Subjunctive theories put forward modal or subjunctive conditions to rule out knowledge by mere luck as to be found in Gettier-style counterexamples to the analysis of knowledge as justified true belief. Because of the subjunctive nature of these conditions the resulting semantics turns out to be non-monotone, even if it is based on non-classical evaluation schemes such as strong Kleene or FDE. This blocks the usual road to fixed-point results for Kripke's theory of truth within these semantics and consequently the paper is predominantly an exploration of fixed point results for Kripke's theory of truth within non-monotone semantics. Using the theory of quasi-inductive definitions we show that in case of the subjunctive theories of knowledge the so-called Kripke jump will have fixed points despite the non-monotonicity of the semantics: Kripke's theory of truth can be successfully applied in the framework of subjunctive theories of knowledge.
Comments: The notion of stabilizing ordinal is not well-defined, i.e., Definition 14 is flawed. As a consequence the results presented in the paper are either incorrect or remain unproved
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Logic (math.LO)
MSC classes: 03A05, 03B42
Cite as: arXiv:2103.13332 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2103.13332v3 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.13332

Submission history

From: Johannes Stern Dr. [view email]
[v1] Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:40:42 UTC (27 KB)
[v2] Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:05:20 UTC (27 KB)
[v3] Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:29:24 UTC (1 KB) (withdrawn)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • Withdrawn
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-03
Change to browse by:
cs
math
math.LO

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)