Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

arXiv:2101.07204 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 18 Jan 2021]

Title:On a limitation of Zeeman polarimetry and imperfect instrumentation in representing solar magnetic fields with weaker polarization signal

Authors:Alexei A. Pevtsov (1), Yang Liu (2), Ilpo Virtanen (3), Luca Bertello (1), Kalevi Mursula (3), K.D. Leka (4,5), Anna L.H. Hughes (1) ((1) National Solar Observatory, 3665 Discovery Drive, 3rd Floor, Boulder, CO 80303 USA, (2) Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, (3) ReSoLVE Centre of Excellence, Space Climate research unit, University of Oulu, POB 3000, FIN-90014, Oulu, Finland, (4) NorthWest Research Associates, 3380 Mitchell Lane, Boulder, CO 80301 USA, (5) Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Furo-cho Chikusa-ku Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601 Japan)
View PDF
Abstract:Full disk vector magnetic fields are used widely for developing better understanding of large-scale structure, morphology, and patterns of the solar magnetic field. The data are also important for modeling various solar phenomena. However, observations of vector magnetic fields have one important limitation that may affect the determination of the true magnetic field orientation. This limitation stems from our ability to interpret the differing character of the Zeeman polarization signals which arise from the photospheric line-of-sight vs. the transverse components of the solar vector magnetic field, and is likely exacerbated by unresolved structure (non-unity fill fraction) as well as the disambiguation of the 180$^\circ$ degeneracy in the transverse-field azimuth. Here we provide a description of this phenomenon, and discuss issues, which require additional investigation.
Comments: 13 pages, 5 figure, Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, accepted, 2021
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)
Cite as: arXiv:2101.07204 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:2101.07204v1 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.07204
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2021003

Submission history

From: Alexei Pevtsov [view email]
[v1] Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:07:13 UTC (1,395 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-01
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)