Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Image and Video Processing

arXiv:2009.00215v1 (eess)
[Submitted on 1 Sep 2020 (this version), latest version 13 Sep 2020 (v2)]

Title:On The Usage Of Average Hausdorff Distance For Segmentation Performance Assessment: Hidden Bias When Used For Ranking

Authors:Orhun Utku Aydin, Abdel Aziz Taha, Adam Hilbert, Ahmed A. Khalil, Ivana Galinovic, Jochen B. Fiebach, Dietmar Frey, Vince Istvan Madai
View PDF
Abstract:Average Hausdorff Distance (AVD) is a widely used performance measure to calculate the distance between two point sets. In medical image segmentation, AVD is used to compare ground truth images with segmentation results allowing their ranking. We identified, however, a ranking bias of AVD making it less suitable for segmentation ranking. To mitigate this bias, we present a modified calculation of AVD that we have coined balanced AVD (bAVD). To simulate segmentations for ranking, we manually created non-overlapping segmentation errors common in cerebral vessel segmentation as our use-case. Adding the created errors consecutively and randomly to the ground truth, we created sets of simulated segmentations with increasing number of errors. Each set of simulated segmentations was ranked using AVD and bAVD. We calculated the Kendall-rank-correlation-coefficient between the segmentation ranking and the number of errors in each simulated segmentation. The rankings produced by bAVD had a significantly higher average correlation (0.969) than those of AVD (0.847). In 200 total rankings, bAVD misranked 52 and AVD misranked 179 segmentations. Our proposed evaluation measure, bAVD, alleviates AVDs ranking bias making it more suitable for rankings and quality assessment of segmentations.
Subjects: Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2009.00215 [eess.IV]
  (or arXiv:2009.00215v1 [eess.IV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.00215

Submission history

From: Orhun Aydin [view email]
[v1] Tue, 1 Sep 2020 03:58:16 UTC (7,543 KB)
[v2] Sun, 13 Sep 2020 13:37:14 UTC (7,543 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
eess.IV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CV
eess

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)