Computer Science > Computational Complexity
[Submitted on 4 Aug 2020 (this version), latest version 7 Nov 2020 (v3)]
Title:Fractional Pseudorandom Generators from the $k$th Fourier Level
View PDFAbstract:In recent work by [CHHL19, CHLT19], the authors exhibit a flexible construction of pseudorandom generators for classes of that satisfy $L_1$ Fourier bounds. [CHHL19] show that if a class satisfies such tail bounds at all levels, this implies a PRG through their random walk framework that composes together fractional PRGs that polarize quickly to the Boolean hypercube. [CHLT19] show by derandomizing the analysis of [RT19] that just level-two Fourier bounds suffice to construct a PRG but naturally obtain exponentially worse dependence on the error in the seed length compared to [CHHL19]. Moreover, this derandomization relies on simulating nearly independent Gaussians for the fractional PRG, which necessitates the polynomial dependence on $1/\epsilon$ in each fractional step.
In this work, we attempt to bridge the gap between these two results. We partially answer an open question by [CHLT19] that nearly interpolates between them. We show that if one has bounds up to the level-$k$ $L_1$ Fourier mass of a closely related class of functions, where $k>2$, one can obtain improved seed length, the degree to which is determined by how high $k$ can be taken. Our analysis shows that for error $\epsilon=1/\text{poly}(n)$, one needs control at just level $O(\log n)$ to recover the seed length of [CHHL19], without assumptions on the entire tail. We avoid this by providing a simple, alternate analysis of their fractional PRG that instead relies on Taylor's theorem and $p$-biased Fourier analysis to avoid assumptions on the weights of the higher-order terms. This further allows us to show that this framework can handle the class of low-degree polynomials over $\mathbb{F}_2$, with slightly worse dependence than the state-of-the-art. We hope that this alternate analysis will be fruitful in improving the understanding of this new and powerful framework.
Submission history
From: Abhishek Shetty [view email][v1] Tue, 4 Aug 2020 04:00:21 UTC (24 KB)
[v2] Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:09:18 UTC (27 KB)
[v3] Sat, 7 Nov 2020 15:58:27 UTC (35 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.