Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2008.00612 (cs)
[Submitted on 3 Aug 2020 (v1), last revised 21 Feb 2021 (this version, v4)]

Title:How Different is Test Case Prioritization for Open and Closed Source Projects?

Authors:Xiao Ling, Rishabh Agrawal, Tim Menzies
View PDF
Abstract:Improved test case prioritization means that software developers can detect and fix more software faults sooner than usual. But is there one "best" prioritization algorithm? Or do different kinds of projects deserve special kinds of prioritization? To answer these questions, this paper applies nine prioritization schemes to 31 projects that range from (a) highly rated open-source Github projects to (b) computational science software to (c) a closed-source project. We find that prioritization approaches that work best for open-source projects can work worst for the closed-source project (and vice versa). From these experiments, we conclude that (a) it is ill-advised to always apply one prioritization scheme to all projects since (b) prioritization requires tuning to different project types.
Comments: 15 pages, 4 figures, 16 tables, accepted to TSE
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2008.00612 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:2008.00612v4 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.00612

Submission history

From: Xiao Ling [view email]
[v1] Mon, 3 Aug 2020 02:20:21 UTC (267 KB)
[v2] Tue, 4 Aug 2020 01:55:45 UTC (267 KB)
[v3] Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:12:10 UTC (351 KB)
[v4] Sun, 21 Feb 2021 03:02:46 UTC (463 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-08
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Xiao Ling
Tim Menzies
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)