Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 29 Mar 2020 (v1), last revised 19 Dec 2020 (this version, v4)]
Title:Byzantine Agreement, Broadcast and State Machine Replication with Near-optimal Good-case Latency
View PDFAbstract:This paper investigates the problem \textit{good-case latency} of Byzantine agreement, broadcast and state machine replication in the synchronous authenticated setting. The good-case latency measure captures the time it takes to reach agreement when all non-faulty parties have the same input (or in BB/SMR when the sender/leader is non-faulty). Previous result implies a lower bound showing that any Byzantine agreement or broadcast protocol tolerating more than $n/3$ faults must have a good-case latency of at least $\Delta$, where $\Delta$ is the assumed maximum message delay bound. Our first result is a family of protocols we call $1\Delta$ that have near-optimal good-case latency. We propose a protocol $1\Delta$-BA that solves Byzantine agreement in the synchronous and authenticated setting with near-optimal good-case latency of $\Delta+2\delta$ and optimal resilience $f<n/2$, where $\delta$ is the actual (unknown) delay bound. We then extend our protocol and present $1\Delta$-BB and $1\Delta$-SMR for Byzantine fault tolerant broadcast and state machine replication, respectively, in the same setting and with the same good-case latency of $\Delta+2\delta$ and $f<n/2$ fault tolerance. Our $1\Delta$-SMR upper bound improves the gap between the best current solution, Sync HotStuff, which obtains a good-case latency of $2\Delta$ per command and the lower bound of $\Delta$ on good-case latency. Finally, we investigate weaker notions of the synchronous setting and show how to adopt the $1\Delta$ approach to these models.
Submission history
From: Zhuolun Xiang [view email][v1] Sun, 29 Mar 2020 22:53:34 UTC (851 KB)
[v2] Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:57:07 UTC (82 KB)
[v3] Thu, 17 Dec 2020 07:19:15 UTC (81 KB)
[v4] Sat, 19 Dec 2020 21:13:55 UTC (82 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.