Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 17 Mar 2020 (this version), latest version 19 Nov 2020 (v5)]
Title:$R^*$: A robust MCMC convergence diagnostic with uncertainty using gradient-boosted machines
View PDFAbstract:Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) has transformed Bayesian model inference over the past three decades and is now a workhorse of applied scientists. Despite its importance, MCMC is a subtle beast which should be used with care. Central to these concerns is the difficulty in determining whether Markov chains have converged to the posterior distribution. The predominant method for monitoring convergence is to run multiple chains and monitor individual chains' characteristics and compare these to the population as a whole: if within-chain and between-chain summaries are comparable, then this may indicate the chains have converged to a stationary distribution. Qualitatively, these summary statistics aim to determine whether it is possible to predict the chain that generated a particular sample: if these predictions are accurate, then the chains have not mixed and convergence has not occurred. Here, we introduce a new method for probing convergence based on training machine learning algorithms to classify samples according to the chain that generated them: we call this convergence measure $R^*$. In contrast to the predominant $\hat{R}$, $R^*$ is a single statistic across all parameters that captures whether convergence has occurred, although individual variables' importance for this metric can also be determined. Additionally, $R^*$ is not based on any single characteristic of the sampling distribution; instead using all the information in the chain, including that given by the joint sampling distributions, which is currently largely overlooked by existing approaches. Since our machine learning method, gradient-boosted regression trees (GBM), provides uncertainty in predictions, as a byproduct, we obtain uncertainty in $R^*$. The method is straightforward to implement, robust to GBM hyperparameter choice, and could be a complementary additional check on MCMC convergence for applied analyses.
Submission history
From: Ben Lambert [view email][v1] Tue, 17 Mar 2020 19:17:11 UTC (153 KB)
[v2] Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:14:39 UTC (325 KB)
[v3] Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:36:25 UTC (325 KB)
[v4] Fri, 4 Sep 2020 12:14:57 UTC (774 KB)
[v5] Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:00:45 UTC (870 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ME
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.