Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 18 Sep 2019 (v1), last revised 1 Oct 2020 (this version, v7)]
Title:Semantic and Cognitive Tools to Aid Statistical Science: Replace Confidence and Significance by Compatibility and Surprise
View PDFAbstract:Researchers often misinterpret and misrepresent statistical outputs. This abuse has led to a large literature on modification or replacement of testing thresholds and $P$-values with confidence intervals, Bayes factors, and other devices. Because the core problems appear cognitive rather than statistical, we review simple aids to statistical interpretations. These aids emphasize logical and information concepts over probability, and thus may be more robust to common misinterpretations than are traditional descriptions. We use the Shannon transform of the $P$-value $p$, also known as the binary surprisal or $S$-value $s=-\log_{2}(p)$, to measure the information supplied by the testing procedure, and to help calibrate intuitions against simple physical experiments like coin tossing. We also use tables or graphs of test statistics for alternative hypotheses, and interval estimates for different percentile levels, to thwart fallacies arising from arbitrary dichotomies. Finally, we reinterpret $P$-values and interval estimates in unconditional terms, which describe compatibility of data with the entire set of analysis assumptions. We illustrate these methods with a reanalysis of data from an existing record-based cohort study. In line with other recent recommendations, we advise that teaching materials and research reports discuss $P$-values as measures of compatibility rather than significance, compute $P$-values for alternative hypotheses whenever they are computed for null hypotheses, and interpret interval estimates as showing values of high compatibility with data, rather than regions of confidence. Our recommendations emphasize cognitive devices for displaying the compatibility of the observed data with various hypotheses of interest, rather than focusing on single hypothesis tests or interval estimates. We believe these simple reforms are well worth the minor effort they require.
Submission history
From: Zad Rafi [view email][v1] Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:09:43 UTC (1,498 KB)
[v2] Thu, 19 Sep 2019 02:49:12 UTC (1,499 KB)
[v3] Sun, 22 Sep 2019 02:18:45 UTC (1,499 KB)
[v4] Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:27:15 UTC (1,234 KB)
[v5] Wed, 8 Jul 2020 01:55:45 UTC (1,252 KB)
[v6] Tue, 29 Sep 2020 18:28:15 UTC (1,251 KB)
[v7] Thu, 1 Oct 2020 01:43:23 UTC (1,251 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ME
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.