Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 9 Nov 2018 (v1), last revised 27 Nov 2018 (this version, v2)]
Title:Swampland criteria for a dark-energy dominated universe, ensuing from Gaussian process and H(z) data analysis
View PDFAbstract:Implications of the string Swampland criteria for a dark energy dominated universe, obtained by using Gaussian processes and $H(z)$ data analysis, are discussed. In particular, the Swampland criteria for a scalar-field dark energy, without assuming any specific form for the potential. By allowing the Gaussian process to reconstruct the form of the potential from $H(z)$ data, upper bounds on the second Swampland criterion (involving $|V^{\prime}|/V$) for two different kernel functions (the squared exponential and Matern~($\nu = 9/2$) kernels) are estimated . The approach here differs from previous studies, since the upper bound of the second Swampland criterion is derived in a thoroughly model-independent way, without resorting to a model-to-model comparison strategy. The analysis is performed using the latest values of $H_{0}$ reported by the Planck and Hubble missions. Results for the estimation of the constant of $SC2$ hint towards the possibility of getting upper bounds well behind the estimations for the dark energy dominated universe as reported in previous studies, which involved model-to-model comparison. Estimations from this new approach turn to be quite sensitive and just depend on the quality of the data and on the kernel employed. This study is a first attempt towards the exploitation of the Swampland criteria in a model-independent way and may be extended to involve other datasets and, also, in trying to understand what is the impact of higher-redshift data on the upper bounds. In the analysis, $40$-point $H(z)$ data have been used, consisting of a $30$-point sample deduced from a differential age method and an additional $10$-point sample obtained from the radial BAO method. Hints towards the possibility of eventually disproving the Swampland conjecture are noted.
Submission history
From: Emilio Elizalde [view email][v1] Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:03:02 UTC (194 KB)
[v2] Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:52:03 UTC (194 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.