Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Quantitative Biology > Neurons and Cognition

arXiv:1803.10753 (q-bio)
[Submitted on 28 Mar 2018]

Title:The comparison of Higuchi fractal dimension and Sample Entropy analysis of sEMG: effects of muscle contraction intensity and TMS

Authors:Milena B. Cukic, Mirjana M. Platisa, Aleksandar Kalauzi, Joji Oommen, Milos R. Ljubisavljevic
View PDF
Abstract:The aim of the study was to examine how the complexity of surface electromyogram (sEMG) signal, estimated by Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD) and Sample Entropy (SampEn), change depending on muscle contraction intensity and external perturbation of the corticospinal activity during muscle contraction induced by single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (spTMS). HFD and SampEn were computed from sEMG signal recorded at three various levels of voluntary contraction before and after spTMS. After spTMS, both HFD and SampEn decreased at medium compared to the mild contraction. SampEn increased, while HFD did not change significantly at strong compared to medium contraction. spTMS significantly decreased both parameters at all contraction levels. When same parameters were computed from the mathematically generated sine-wave calibration curves, the results show that SampEn has better accuracy at lower (0-40 Hz) and HFD at higher (60-120 Hz) frequencies. Changes in the sEMG complexity associated with increased muscle contraction intensity cannot be accurately depicted by a single complexity measure. Examination of sEMG should entail both SampEn and HFD as they provide complementary information about different frequency components of sEMG. Further studies are needed to explain the implication of changes in nonlinear parameters and their relation to underlying sEMG physiological processes.
Comments: 21 pages, 3 Figures
Subjects: Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)
Cite as: arXiv:1803.10753 [q-bio.NC]
  (or arXiv:1803.10753v1 [q-bio.NC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.10753

Submission history

From: Milena Čukić Dr [view email]
[v1] Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:44:44 UTC (447 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
q-bio
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-03
Change to browse by:
q-bio.NC

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)