Quantitative Biology > Neurons and Cognition
[Submitted on 19 Mar 2018 (v1), last revised 11 Feb 2019 (this version, v2)]
Title:A Theoretical Study of Process Dependence for Critical Statistics in Standard Serial Models and Standard Parallel Models
View PDFAbstract:Critical parts of the definitions of standard serial and standard parallel modes refer to stochastic independence. Standard serial models are defined by stochastic independence and identical distributions of their processing times. Processing times in the serial models are identical to the intercompletion time statistics. Similarly, standard parallel models assume stochastically independent and identical processing times. Their processing times are equivalent to the statistic known as total completion times. Little is known about what standard serial models can predict for the total completion time or what standard parallel models can predict for the intercompletion times. Here we demonstrate that standard serial models possess a tendency to predict a positive dependence for the total completion times with that always being true in the case of a single processing order. However, with mixtures of processing orders, standard serial models may predict negative dependence of the total completion times. Comparably, standard parallel models typically predict neither independence of the intercompletion times nor identical distributions. In fact, standard parallel models predict increasing intercompletion times as the individual channels continue to finish. Nevertheless, dramatically increasing hazard functions of the channels can defeat that tendency. And, standard parallel models can predict intercompletion time independence but only when individual channel distributions are exponential. Finally, we use these and ancillary mathematical results to conclude that standard serial and standard parallel models can never perfectly mimic one another. Therefore, our findings set the stage for explicit model testing between these classes.
Submission history
From: Ru Zhang [view email][v1] Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:02:09 UTC (1,505 KB)
[v2] Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:22:00 UTC (1,919 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.