Condensed Matter > Disordered Systems and Neural Networks
[Submitted on 13 Mar 2018 (v1), last revised 7 Jul 2020 (this version, v2)]
Title:Inferring neuronal couplings from spiking data using a systematic procedure with a statistical criterion
View PDFAbstract:Recent remarkable advances in the experimental techniques have provided a background for inferring neuronal couplings from point process data that includes a great number of neurons. Here, we propose a systematic procedure for pre- and post-processing generic point process data in an objective manner, to handle data in the framework of a binary simple statistical model, the Ising or generalized McCulloch--Pitts model. The procedure involves two steps: (1) determining time-bin size for transforming the point-process data into discrete-time binary data and (2) screening relevant couplings from the estimated couplings. For the first step, we decide the optimal time-bin size by introducing the null hypothesis that all neurons would fire independently, then choosing a time-bin size so that the null hypothesis is rejected with the most strict criterion. The likelihood associated with the null hypothesis is analytically evaluated and used for the rejection process. For the second post-processing step, after a certain estimator of coupling is obtained based on the pre-processed dataset, the estimate is compared with many other estimates derived from datasets obtained by randomizing the original dataset in the time direction. We accept the original estimate as relevant only if its absolute value is sufficiently larger than them of randomized datasets. These manipulations suppress false positive couplings induced by statistical noise. We apply this inference procedure to spiking data from synthetic and in vitro neuronal networks. The results show that the proposed procedure identifies the presence/absence of synaptic couplings fairly well including their signs, for the synthetic and experimental data. In particular, the results support that we can infer the physical connections of underlying systems in favorable situations, even when using the simple statistical model.
Submission history
From: Yu Terada [view email][v1] Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:44:09 UTC (1,039 KB)
[v2] Tue, 7 Jul 2020 10:16:18 UTC (2,332 KB)
Current browse context:
cond-mat.dis-nn
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.