Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Discrete Mathematics

arXiv:1803.01478 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Mar 2018 (v1), last revised 12 Mar 2018 (this version, v2)]

Title:Two-sided popular matchings in bipartite graphs with forbidden/forced elements and weights

Authors:Yuri Faenza, Vladlena Powers, Xingyu Zhang
View PDF
Abstract:Two-sided popular matchings in bipartite graphs are a well-known generalization of stable matchings in the marriage setting, and they are especially relevant when preference lists are incomplete. In this case, the cardinality of a stable matching can be as small as half the size of a maximum matching. Popular matchings allow for assignments of larger size while still guaranteeing a certain fairness condition. In fact, stable matchings are popular matchings of minimum size, and a maximum size popular matching can be as large as twice the size of a(ny) stable matching in a given instance. The structure of popular matchings seems to be more complex, and currently less understood, than that of stable matchings. In this paper, we focus on three optimization problems related to popular matchings. First, we give a granular analysis of the complexity of popular matching with forbidden and forced elements problems, thus complementing results from [Cseh and Kavitha, 2016]. In particular, we show that deciding whether there exists a popular matching with (or without) two given edges is NP-Hard. This implies that finding a popular matching of maximum (resp. minimum) weight is NP-Hard and, even if all weights are nonnegative, inapproximable up to a factor 1/2 (resp. up to any factor). A decomposition theorem from [Cseh and Kavitha, 2016] can be employed to give a 1/2 approximation to the maximum weighted popular matching problem with nonnegative weights, thus completely settling the complexity of those problems.
Comments: 14 pages, 4 figures
Subjects: Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM)
MSC classes: 68R10, 05C70, 91B68
Cite as: arXiv:1803.01478 [cs.DM]
  (or arXiv:1803.01478v2 [cs.DM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.01478

Submission history

From: Yuri Faenza [view email]
[v1] Mon, 5 Mar 2018 03:07:07 UTC (95 KB)
[v2] Mon, 12 Mar 2018 05:05:23 UTC (97 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.DM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-03
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Yuri Faenza
Vladlena Powers
Xingyu Zhang
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)