Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 7 Feb 2018 (v1), revised 3 Jun 2018 (this version, v2), latest version 16 Sep 2020 (v3)]
Title:Intentional Control of Type I Error over Unconscious Data Distortion: a Neyman-Pearson Approach to Text Classification
View PDFAbstract:Digital texts have become an increasingly important source of data for social studies. However, textual data from open platforms are vulnerable to manipulation (e.g., censorship and information inflation), often leading to bias in subsequent empirical analysis. This paper investigates the problem of data distortion in text classification when controlling type I error (a relevant textual message is classified as irrelevant) is the priority. The default classical classification paradigm that minimizes the overall classification error can yield an undesirably large type I error, and data distortion exacerbates this situation. As a solution, we propose the Neyman-Pearson (NP) classification paradigm which minimizes type II error under a user-specified type I error constraint. Theoretically, we show that while the classical oracle (i.e., optimal classifier) cannot be recovered under unknown data distortion even if one has the entire post-distortion population, the NP oracle is unaffected by data distortion and can be recovered under the same condition. Empirically, we illustrate the advantage of NP classification methods in a case study that classifies posts about strikes and corruption published on a leading Chinese blogging platform.
Submission history
From: Lucy Xia [view email][v1] Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:33:20 UTC (831 KB)
[v2] Sun, 3 Jun 2018 19:21:05 UTC (994 KB)
[v3] Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:49:46 UTC (925 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ME
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.