Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 2 Jan 2018 (v1), last revised 11 Feb 2018 (this version, v2)]
Title:Bayesian Tabulation Audits: Explained and Extended
View PDFAbstract:Tabulation audits for an election provide statistical evidence that a reported contest outcome is "correct" (meaning that the tabulation of votes was properly performed), or else the tabulation audit determines the correct outcome.
Stark proposed risk-limiting tabulation audits for this purpose; such audits are effective and are beginning to be used in practice.
We expand the study of election audits based on Bayesian methods, first introduced by Rivest and Shen in 2012. (The risk-limiting audits proposed by Stark are "frequentist" rather than Bayesian in character.)
We first provide a simplified presentation of Bayesian tabulation audits. A Bayesian tabulation audit begins by drawing a random sample of the votes in that contest, and tallying those votes. It then considers what effect statistical variations of this tally have on the contest outcome. If such variations almost always yield the previously-reported outcome, the audit terminates, accepting the reported outcome. Otherwise the audit is repeated with an enlarged sample.
Bayesian audits are attractive because they work with any method for determining the winner (such as ranked-choice voting).
We then show how Bayesian audits may be extended to handle more complex situations, such as auditing contests that \emph{span multiple jurisdictions}, or are otherwise "stratified."
We highlight the auditing of such multiple-jurisdiction contests where some of the jurisdictions have an electronic cast vote record (CVR) for each cast paper vote, while the others do not. Complex situations such as this may arise naturally when some counties in a state have upgraded to new equipment, while others have not. Bayesian audits are able to handle such situations in a straightforward manner.
We also discuss the benefits and relevant considerations for using Bayesian audits in practice.
Submission history
From: Ronald Rivest [view email][v1] Tue, 2 Jan 2018 00:00:15 UTC (1,671 KB)
[v2] Sun, 11 Feb 2018 23:41:18 UTC (1,671 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.AP
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.