Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods
[Submitted on 27 Nov 2017 (v1), revised 22 Dec 2017 (this version, v2), latest version 6 Sep 2018 (v4)]
Title:Accurate autocorrelation modeling substantially improves fMRI reliability
View PDFAbstract:Given the recent controversies in some neuroimaging statistical methods, we compared the most frequently used functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) analysis packages: AFNI, FSL and SPM, with regard to temporal autocorrelation modeling. We used both resting state and task-based fMRI data, altogether ten datasets containing 780 scans corresponding to different scanning sequences and subject populations. In analyses of each fMRI scan we considered different assumed experimental designs and smoothing levels. For data with no expected experimentally-induced activation, FSL and SPM resulted in much higher false positive rates than AFNI. We showed it was because of residual positive autocorrelation left after pre-whitening. On the other hand, due to SPM modeling temporal autocorrelation in the least flexible way, it can introduce negative autocorrelations during pre-whitening for scans with long repetition times. As a result, for one task-based dataset we observed a large loss of sensitivity when SPM was used. Interestingly, because pre-whitening in FSL and SPM does not remove a substantial part of the temporal autocorrelation in the noise, we found a strong relationship in which the lower the assumed experimental design frequency, the more likely it was to observe significant activation. Though temporal autocorrelation modeling in AFNI was not perfect, its performance was much higher than the performance of temporal autocorrelation modeling in FSL and SPM. FSL and SPM could improve their autocorrelation modeling approaches for example by adopting a noise model similar to the one used by AFNI.
Submission history
From: Wiktor Olszowy [view email][v1] Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:49:44 UTC (280 KB)
[v2] Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:27:58 UTC (950 KB)
[v3] Fri, 11 May 2018 17:56:42 UTC (1,439 KB)
[v4] Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:03:57 UTC (1,133 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.