Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > General Physics

arXiv:1711.09009 (physics)
[Submitted on 20 Nov 2017 (v1), last revised 2 Jun 2019 (this version, v2)]

Title:Do ghost fields really make massive gravity invalid?

Authors:I. Schmelzer
View PDF
Abstract:Theories which contain ghost fields are considered to be invalid. It is assumed that for such theories the energy is unbounded from below, and the theory will be unstable, allowing the creation of particle pairs with arbitrarily large positive and negative energies. Such ghost fields are a serious problem for theories of massive gravity.
We present here an example of such a theory of gravity with a ghost field which avoids this problem. While its equations are locally equivalent to those of a theory of massive gravity with a ghost field, global restrictions of the configuration space have the result that the ghost mode has to remain small, and the energy has to remain positive.
As a consequence, the existence of a ghost-like mode in the equations of the theory is not a decisive argument against this theory.
Subjects: General Physics (physics.gen-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1711.09009 [physics.gen-ph]
  (or arXiv:1711.09009v2 [physics.gen-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.09009

Submission history

From: Ilja Schmelzer [view email]
[v1] Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:23:05 UTC (12 KB)
[v2] Sun, 2 Jun 2019 09:53:38 UTC (12 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
physics.gen-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-11
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)