Statistics > Applications
[Submitted on 28 Oct 2017 (v1), last revised 15 Jun 2018 (this version, v2)]
Title:A Geometric Perspective on the Power of Principal Component Association Tests in Multiple Phenotype Studies
View PDFAbstract:Joint analysis of multiple phenotypes can increase statistical power in genetic association studies. Principal component analysis, as a popular dimension reduction method, especially when the number of phenotypes is high-dimensional, has been proposed to analyze multiple correlated phenotypes. It has been empirically observed that the first PC, which summarizes the largest amount of variance, can be less powerful than higher order PCs and other commonly used methods in detecting genetic association signals. In this paper, we investigate the properties of PCA-based multiple phenotype analysis from a geometric perspective by introducing a novel concept called principal angle. A particular PC is powerful if its principal angle is $0^o$ and is powerless if its principal angle is $90^o$. Without prior knowledge about the true principal angle, each PC can be powerless. We propose linear, non-linear and data-adaptive omnibus tests by combining PCs. We show that the omnibus PC test is robust and powerful in a wide range of scenarios. We study the properties of the proposed methods using power analysis and eigen-analysis. The subtle differences and close connections between these combined PC methods are illustrated graphically in terms of their rejection boundaries. Our proposed tests have convex acceptance regions and hence are admissible. The $p$-values for the proposed tests can be efficiently calculated analytically and the proposed tests have been implemented in a publicly available R package {\it MPAT}. We conduct simulation studies in both low and high dimensional settings with various signal vectors and correlation structures. We apply the proposed tests to the joint analysis of metabolic syndrome related phenotypes with data sets collected from four international consortia to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed combined PC testing procedures.
Submission history
From: Zhonghua Liu [view email][v1] Sat, 28 Oct 2017 03:53:09 UTC (1,059 KB)
[v2] Fri, 15 Jun 2018 03:17:22 UTC (1,060 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.