Condensed Matter > Materials Science
[Submitted on 23 Oct 2017 (v1), last revised 5 Jul 2018 (this version, v2)]
Title:Quantifying Confidence in DFT Predicted Surface Pourbaix Diagrams of Transition Metal Electrode-Electrolyte Interfaces
View PDFAbstract:Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations have been widely used to predict the activity of catalysts based on the free energies of reaction intermediates. The incorporation of the state of the catalyst surface under the electrochemical operating conditions while constructing the free energy diagram is crucial, without which even trends in activity predictions could be imprecisely captured. Surface Pourbaix diagrams indicate the surface state as a function of the pH and the potential. In this work, we utilize error-estimation capabilities within the BEEF-vdW exchange correlation functional as an ensemble approach to propagate the uncertainty associated with the adsorption energetics in the construction of Pourbaix diagrams. Within this approach, surface-transition phase boundaries are no longer sharp and are therefore associated with a finite width. We determine the surface phase diagram for several transition metals under reaction conditions and electrode potentials relevant for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR). We observe that our surface phase predictions for most predominant species are in good agreement with cyclic voltammetry experiments and prior DFT studies. We use the OH$^*$ intermediate for comparing adsorption characteristics on Pt(111), Pt(100), Pd(111), Ir(111), Rh(111), and Ru(0001) since it has been shown to have a higher prediction efficiency relative to O$^*$, and find the trend Ru>Rh>Ir>Pt>Pd for (111) metal facets, where Ru binds OH$^*$ the strongest. We robustly predict the likely surface phase as a function of reaction conditions by associating c-values to quantifying the confidence in predictions within the Pourbaix diagram. We define a confidence quantifying metric using which certain experimentally observed surface phases and peak assignments can be better rationalized.
Submission history
From: Venkatasubramanian Viswanathan [view email][v1] Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:57:16 UTC (1,615 KB)
[v2] Thu, 5 Jul 2018 19:40:26 UTC (8,240 KB)
Current browse context:
cond-mat
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.