Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Computers and Society

arXiv:1709.03581 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Sep 2017]

Title:Evaluation of the efficiency and quality in structured crime reports

Authors:Martin Boldt
View PDF
Abstract:This work evaluates a novel structured method for reporting crime and registering crime scene data by comparing the method with traditional text-based crime reports. Swedish law enforcement officers were asked to register a residential burglary using both methods in order to measure the effectiveness of each method. The effectiveness was quantified as both the time it took to register the crime as well as the number of relevant unique crime scene details that were collected. The results show the structured method to be significantly more efficient than traditional text-based crime reports (p < 0.05). Also, the novel method registers 2.96 times more relevant and unique crime scene details on average. In addition to the differences in efficiency this work also discusses more qualitative pros and cons with the novel method, as well as various data analysis methods that could be used on the registered data. It is concluded that the novel method can benefit law enforcement agencies in two ways. First, related to increased quality and more elaborate crime reports. Secondly, related to significant time-savings, which according to a rough estimate is expect to lie in the range 11-30 full-time positions per year for Swedish law enforcement agencies, particularly for volume crime categories. Those resources could instead be used for unburden the workload for our law enforcement officers, and to some extent free resources that could be used in other parts of the organization.
Note: this pre-print manuscript is written in Swedish.
Comments: 21 pages, 3 figures, 1 table, in Swedish
Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:1709.03581 [cs.CY]
  (or arXiv:1709.03581v1 [cs.CY] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1709.03581

Submission history

From: Martin Boldt [view email]
[v1] Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:32:21 UTC (571 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CY
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-09
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Martin Boldt
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)