Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:1708.06160 (stat)
[Submitted on 21 Aug 2017]

Title:Economic Design of Memory-Type Control Charts: The Fallacy of the Formula Proposed by Lorenzen and Vance (1986)

Authors:Amir Ahmadi-Javid, Mohsen Ebadi
View PDF
Abstract:The memory-type control charts, such as EWMA and CUSUM, are powerful tools for detecting small quality changes in univariate and multivariate processes. Many papers on economic design of these control charts use the formula proposed by Lorenzen and Vance (1986) [Lorenzen, T. J., & Vance, L. C. (1986). The economic design of control charts: A unified approach. Technometrics, 28(1), 3-10, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1269598]. This paper shows that this formula is not correct for memory-type control charts and its values can significantly deviate from the original values even if the ARL values used in this formula are accurately computed. Consequently, the use of this formula can result in charts that are not economically optimal. The formula is corrected for memory-type control charts, but unfortunately the modified formula is not a helpful tool from a computational perspective. We show that simulation-based optimization is a possible alternative method.
Comments: Computational Statistics, 2020
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); General Economics (econ.GN); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
Cite as: arXiv:1708.06160 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:1708.06160v1 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.06160
Journal reference: Ahmadi-Javid, A., & Ebadi, M. (2020). Economic design of memory-type control charts: The fallacy of the formula proposed by Lorenzen and Vance (1986). Computational Statistics, DOI: 10.1007/s00180-020-01019-6
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-020-01019-6

Submission history

From: Amir Ahmadi Javid [view email]
[v1] Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:38:26 UTC (902 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
math.OC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CE
econ
econ.GN
math
q-fin
q-fin.EC
stat
stat.AP

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)